Lindenborn v. Vogel

110 N.Y.S. 970

This text of 110 N.Y.S. 970 (Lindenborn v. Vogel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindenborn v. Vogel, 110 N.Y.S. 970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves the same question as is passed upon in the case of Fluegelman v. Armstrong (decided at the-present term of this court) 110 N. Y. Supp. 967. Under the decision in that case, the judgment herein must be reversed.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and motion to open default denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fluegelman v. Armstrong
59 Misc. 506 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 N.Y.S. 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindenborn-v-vogel-nyappterm-1908.