Lindenberger v. Wilson
This text of 1 D.C. 340 (Lindenberger v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action was upon the non-acceptance only, and the Court instructed the jury, that the plaintiff was bound to give notice to the defendant of the non-acceptance of the bill, as soon as possible under all the circumstances, according to the usual course of communication, whether by land or water; and that it was the duty of the plaintiffs, who reside at Baltimore, to give notice to defendant as soon as possible, according to the course of the mail between Baltimore and Alexandria. See Chitty on Bills, 93, 98, 139, 140; Kyd, 76.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 D.C. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindenberger-v-wilson-dcd-1806.