Lindenberger v. Wilson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Lindenberger v. Wilson

15 F. Cas. 554, 1 Cranch 340

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 15 F. Cas. 554 (Lindenberger v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindenberger v. Wilson, 15 F. Cas. 554, 1 Cranch 340 (circtddc 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

The action was upon the non-acceptance only, and THE COURT instructed the jury, that the plaintiff was bound to give notice to the defendant of the non-acceptance of the bill, as soon as possible under all the circumstances, according to the usual course of communication, whether by land or water; and that it was the duty of the plaintiffs, who reside at Baltimore, to give notice to defendant as soon as possible, according to the course of the mail between Baltimore and Alexandria. See Chit. Bills, 93, 98, 139, 140; Kyd, Bills, 76.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action was upon the non-acceptance only, and THE COURT instructed the jury, that the plaintiff was bound to give notice to the defendant of the non-acceptance of the bill, as soon as possible under all the circumstances, according to the usual course of communication, whether by land or water; and that it was the duty of the plaintiffs, who reside at Baltimore, to give notice to defendant as soon as possible, according to the course of the mail between Baltimore and Alexandria. See Chit. Bills, 93, 98, 139, 140; Kyd, Bills, 76.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F. Cas. 554, 1 Cranch 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindenberger-v-wilson-circtddc-1806.