Lindenberger v. Beall

Supreme Court

Lindenberger v. Beall

19 U.S. 104, 5 L. Ed. 216, 6 Wheat. 104, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 344

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 18, 1821·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

The Court were unanimously of opinion, that after , demand of the maker on the third day of grace, notice to the endorser on. the same day was sufficient, by the general law merchant; and that evi-. dence of the letter containing notice having been put into the post-office, directed to the defendant, at his place of residence, was sufficient proof of the notice to be left to the jury, and that it was unnecessary to give, notice to the defendant to produce the letter before such evidence could be admitted.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court were unanimously of opinion, that after , demand of the maker on the third day of grace, notice to the endorser on. the same day was sufficient, by the general law merchant; and that evi-. dence of the letter containing notice having been put into the post-office, directed to the defendant, at his place of residence, was sufficient proof of the notice to be left to the jury, and that it was unnecessary to give, notice to the defendant to produce the letter before such evidence could be admitted.

Judgment reversed.

Lindenberger v. Beall, 19 U.S. 104, 5 L. Ed. 216, 6 Wheat. 104, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 344 (1821).

Pincite

19 U.S. 104 (Lindenberger v. Beall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related