Lindenberger v. Beall

Supreme Court

Lindenberger v. Beall

19 U.S. 104, 5 L. Ed. 216, 6 Wheat. 104, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 344

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 18, 1821

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 19 U.S. 104 (Lindenberger v. Beall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindenberger v. Beall, 19 U.S. 104, 5 L. Ed. 216, 6 Wheat. 104, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 344 (1821).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court were unanimously of opinion, that after , demand of the maker on the third day of grace, notice to the endorser on. the same day was sufficient, by the general law merchant; and that evi-. dence of the letter containing notice having been put into the post-office, directed to the defendant, at his place of residence, was sufficient proof of the notice to be left to the jury, and that it was unnecessary to give, notice to the defendant to produce the letter before such evidence could be admitted.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court were unanimously of opinion, that after , demand of the maker on the third day of grace, notice to the endorser on. the same day was sufficient, by the general law merchant; and that evi-. dence of the letter containing notice having been put into the post-office, directed to the defendant, at his place of residence, was sufficient proof of the notice to be left to the jury, and that it was unnecessary to give, notice to the defendant to produce the letter before such evidence could be admitted.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 U.S. 104, 5 L. Ed. 216, 6 Wheat. 104, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindenberger-v-beall-scotus-1821.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack