Lindenauer v. Lindenauer
This text of 248 A.D. 560 (Lindenauer v. Lindenauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders denying plaintiff’s motion for alimony and counsel fee pendente lite, and granting plaintiff’s motion for a reargument, and upon reargument adhering to the original decision, unanimously affirmed, without prejudice to another application upon defendant’s counterclaim if interposed. Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Glennon and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindenauer-v-lindenauer-nyappdiv-1936.