Lindenau v. ST. LOUIS ARC, INC.

351 S.W.3d 250, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1416, 2011 WL 5065582

• Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
• Decided: October 25, 2011
• Docket: ED 96272
• Status: Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rebecca Lindenau (Employee) appeals the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. A Division deputy with the Missouri Division of Employment Security initially determined that Employee was ineligible for benefits, finding that she was terminated for misconduct. Employee appealed to the Appeals Tribunal, which reversed the decision of the deputy, finding that Employee was not terminated for misconduct and that her former employer was not an interested party because it had filed its protest too late. The former employer then appealed to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission which reversed the decision of the Tribunal and denied Employee unemployment benefits.

On appeal, Employee claims there was insufficient evidence to establish that her actions cited by the Commission as misconduct were willful.

We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.