Linden v. West 21st Street Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Linden v. West 21st Street Holding Corp.

257 A.D. 844, 12 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8122

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 844 (Linden v. West 21st Street Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linden v. West 21st Street Holding Corp., 257 A.D. 844, 12 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting reargument and upon reargument denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate a judgment of dismissal and to restore the case to the calendar reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, upon condition that within five days from the entry of the order hereon plaintiffs pay to defendant West 21st Street Holding Corp., twenty-five dollars costs; otherwise, order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from the original order dismissed. The court was justified in dismissing the complaint upon the failure of plaintiffs’ attorney to appear and select a jury after the case had been answered “ ready ” by his clerk and the attorneys for both defendants. Plaintiffs’ default, however, is excused in part because their attorney relied upon the statement of a representative of the attorney for one of the defendants that he would be unable to proceed because of the absence of a material witness. Under the circumstances we believe plaintiffs’ default should have been opened upon the payment of appropriate costs to the other defendant, whose attorney had been assured the trial was to proceed on January 24,1939. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting reargument and upon reargument denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate a judgment of dismissal and to restore the case to the calendar reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, upon condition that within five days from the entry of the order hereon plaintiffs pay to defendant West 21st Street Holding Corp., twenty-five dollars costs; otherwise, order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from the original order dismissed. The court was justified in dismissing the complaint upon the failure of plaintiffs’ attorney to appear and select a jury after the case had been answered “ ready ” by his clerk and the attorneys for both defendants. Plaintiffs’ default, however, is excused in part because their attorney relied upon the statement of a representative of the attorney for one of the defendants that he would be unable to proceed because of the absence of a material witness. Under the circumstances we believe plaintiffs’ default should have been opened upon the payment of appropriate costs to the other defendant, whose attorney had been assured the trial was to proceed on January 24,1939. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 844, 12 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linden-v-west-21st-street-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1939.