Linden v. Ingram

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Linden v. Ingram

26 A.D.2d 645, 272 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3693

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 645 (Linden v. Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linden v. Ingram, 26 A.D.2d 645, 272 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover upon a judgment of the Supreme Court of Ontario, Canada, in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants, defendants appeal separately from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered November 30, 1965, as granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The court further directed that entry of judgment be held in abeyance, pending determination of a counterclaim interposed by defendant Freedman, and granted leave to defendant Ingram to interpose a like counterclaim. [646]*646Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed (Vander v. Casperson, 12 N Y 2d 56), with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to plaintiffs payable by defendants jointly. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover upon a judgment of the Supreme Court of Ontario, Canada, in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants, defendants appeal separately from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered November 30, 1965, as granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The court further directed that entry of judgment be held in abeyance, pending determination of a counterclaim interposed by defendant Freedman, and granted leave to defendant Ingram to interpose a like counterclaim. [646]*646Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed (Vander v. Casperson, 12 N Y 2d 56), with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to plaintiffs payable by defendants jointly. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 645, 272 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linden-v-ingram-nyappdiv-1966.