Linden v. Graham

34 Barb. 316, 1861 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 100
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 6, 1861·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This action could be maintained under the act of 1855, to provide for the due apportionment of taxes and assessments, and for the sale of real estate to pay the same, (Laws of 1855, ch. 327;) or it might have been maintained in equity, under the old system of practice.

The complaint shows a state of facts entitling the plaintiff to the relief demanded, so far as relates to the apportionment of the taxes, and that the defendant pay her proportion thereof.

The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered; costs to abide the event.

Clerke, Ingraham and Suther land, Justices.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linden v. Graham, 34 Barb. 316, 1861 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 100 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1861).

34 Barb. 316 (Linden v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lester v. Seilliere
50 A.D. 239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Rea v. Rea
29 N.W. 703 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)