Linden v. Fox

389 N.E.2d 141, 46 N.Y.2d 969, 415 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1887
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 20, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 389 N.E.2d 141 (Linden v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linden v. Fox, 389 N.E.2d 141, 46 N.Y.2d 969, 415 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1887 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinion

Motion to dismiss plaintiffs appeal as of right from unanimous Appellate Division orders granting defendants’ motions to dismiss, respectively, plaintiffs notice of appeal and amended notice of appeal to the Appellate Division granted and the appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that an appeal does not lie (NY Const, art VI, § 3; CPLR 5601). On the court’s own motion, plaintiffs appeal as of right from Appellate Division orders denying her cross motions to dismiss defendants’ motions dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that an appeal does not lie (NY Const, art VI, § 3; CPLR 5601).

Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John T. Brady & Co. v. Form-Eze Systems, Inc.
623 F.2d 261 (Second Circuit, 1980)
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
623 F.2d 261 (Second Circuit, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 N.E.2d 141, 46 N.Y.2d 969, 415 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linden-v-fox-ny-1979.