Lindemann v. S.S. Kresge Company
10 A.2d 733, 124 N.J.L. 129, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 256
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance —The Chancellor, Trenchard, Donges, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.
For reversal—Case, Perskie, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lindemann v. S.S. Kresge Company, 10 A.2d 733, 124 N.J.L. 129, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 256 (N.J. 1940).
10 A.2d 733 (Lindemann v. S.S. Kresge Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.