Lindemann v. Delaney
This text of 248 A.D. 718 (Lindemann v. Delaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioners moved for a peremptory order of mandamus directing defendants to reinstate them to their former positions as inspectors of equipment (railroad cars and trucks) in the board of transportation of the "city "of New York. An alternative order was granted to which defendants filed a return, and the issues thereby raised were tried before the court and a jury. The court directed a verdict in favor of defendants. Defendants thereafter moved for a final order dismissing the petition, which motion was granted, and petitioners appealed. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindemann-v-delaney-nyappdiv-1936.