Lindemann v. City of Wentzville

245 S.W.3d 263, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 217, 2008 WL 375598
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2008·No. ED 89790·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*264 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert and Susan Lindemann appeal the judgment of the trial court dismissing their exceptions in condemnation and petition for damages against the City of Wentzville. We find no error in the trial court’s determination. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b). 1

1

. The City's motions to dismiss the appeal and for damages for frivolous appeal are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lindemann v. City of Wentzville, 245 S.W.3d 263, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 217, 2008 WL 375598 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

245 S.W.3d 263 (Lindemann v. City of Wentzville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of H.J.G.
245 S.W.3d 263 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)