Lindemann v. City of Wentzville

245 S.W.3d 263, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 217, 2008 WL 375598
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 13, 2008
DocketED 89790
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 S.W.3d 263 (Lindemann v. City of Wentzville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindemann v. City of Wentzville, 245 S.W.3d 263, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 217, 2008 WL 375598 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

*264 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert and Susan Lindemann appeal the judgment of the trial court dismissing their exceptions in condemnation and petition for damages against the City of Wentzville. We find no error in the trial court’s determination. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b). 1

1

. The City's motions to dismiss the appeal and for damages for frivolous appeal are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of H.J.G.
245 S.W.3d 263 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 S.W.3d 263, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 217, 2008 WL 375598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindemann-v-city-of-wentzville-moctapp-2008.