Lindell Professional Building v. Slater

248 S.W.3d 639, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 409, 2008 WL 821007
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 2008·No. ED 89678·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cassie Slater, d/b/a as Midwest Insurance Agency and Midwest Financial Services, appeals from the trial court’s judgment (judgment) in favor of The Lindell Professional Building (Lindell) on Lindell’s unlawful detainer petition to recover damages and possession of property. 1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. See Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. Given our disposition of the case, Lindell’s motion to strike Slater’s reply brief is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lindell Professional Building v. Slater, 248 S.W.3d 639, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 409, 2008 WL 821007 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

248 S.W.3d 639 (Lindell Professional Building v. Slater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)