Linde v. Linde

44 A.3d 654

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Linde v. Linde. Read the opinion of the Court — 612 Pa. 477 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 23, 2012·No. 100 MAP 2011·Published

Opinion

44 A.3d 654 (2012)

Eric R. LINDE, derivatively on behalf of Linde Enterprises, Inc.,
v.
Scott F. LINDE, Barbara Linde Bold, Lackawanna Land & Energy Inc., Total Landscaping Inc., Linde International Inc., Pocono Consolidated Utilities Inc., Forest City Partnership, Allen Sorchek, John Piepoli, John Bold, and Linde Enterprises Inc.
Appeal of Scott F. Linde, Barbara Linde Bold, Linde Enterprises Inc., and Non-Parties BSL, Linde Corp. and McGrail Merkel Quinn & Associates.

No. 100 MAP 2011.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 9, 2012. Decided May 23, 2012.

655 ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed as having been IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

44 A.3d 654 (2012)

Eric R. LINDE, derivatively on behalf of Linde Enterprises, Inc.,
v.
Scott F. LINDE, Barbara Linde Bold, Lackawanna Land & Energy Inc., Total Landscaping Inc., Linde International Inc., Pocono Consolidated Utilities Inc., Forest City Partnership, Allen Sorchek, John Piepoli, John Bold, and Linde Enterprises Inc.
Appeal of Scott F. Linde, Barbara Linde Bold, Linde Enterprises Inc., and Non-Parties BSL, Linde Corp. and McGrail Merkel Quinn & Associates.

No. 100 MAP 2011.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 9, 2012. Decided May 23, 2012.

655 ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed as having been IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

Linde v. Linde, 44 A.3d 654 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

44 A.3d 654 (Linde v. Linde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.