Lindback v. Lesko

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lindback v. Lesko

513 So. 2d 718, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2295, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12185

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 22, 1987

DocketNo. 87-9

StatusPublished

This text of 513 So. 2d 718 (Lindback v. Lesko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindback v. Lesko, 513 So. 2d 718, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2295, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12185 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the order under review granting a new trial on the well-articulated and fully supported grounds that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and indicated that the jury had been influenced by considerations outside the record. See Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981); Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the order under review granting a new trial on the well-articulated and fully supported grounds that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and indicated that the jury had been influenced by considerations outside the record. See Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981); Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

513 So. 2d 718, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2295, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindback-v-lesko-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack