Lindamood v. Astrue

D.C. Circuit

Lindamood v. Astrue

269 F. App'x 3

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 2008

DocketNo. 07-5115

StatusPublished

This text of 269 F. App'x 3 (Lindamood v. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindamood v. Astrue, 269 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 19, 2007 be affirmed. Appellant has failed to establish that the district court erred in finding that the administrative law judge properly relied on the testimony of the vocational expert and correctly evaluated the plaintiff’s subjective complaints when denying his claim for disability benefits.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en bane. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 19, 2007 be affirmed. Appellant has failed to establish that the district court erred in finding that the administrative law judge properly relied on the testimony of the vocational expert and correctly evaluated the plaintiff’s subjective complaints when denying his claim for disability benefits.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en bane. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 F. App'x 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindamood-v-astrue-cadc-2008.