Lindahl v. Rubright
723 N.W.2d 822, 477 Mich. 942
Opinion
John Edwin LINDAHL, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Christina Eileen RUBRIGHT, Defendant-Appellee, and
Darcy Ryland, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lindahl v. Rubright, 723 N.W.2d 822, 477 Mich. 942 (Mich. 2006).
723 N.W.2d 822 (Lindahl v. Rubright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.