Lindahl v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Lindahl v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin Railroad

94 N.W. 1134, 89 Minn. 283, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 508

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 15, 1903

DocketNos. 13,416—(80)

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.W. 1134 (Lindahl v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindahl v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin Railroad, 94 N.W. 1134, 89 Minn. 283, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 508 (Mich. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appealed to the district court from an award of damages in condemnation proceedings, where he recovered a verdict of $200; and defendant appealed to this court from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

[284]*284A large number of errors are assigned, but a careful examination of them discloses no new or serious question of law or practice, and the case does not require an extended opinion. We have examined all the assignments, and discover no reversible error. Most of the errors assigned relate to the admission or exclusion of evidence, and, though perhaps some little incompetent or irrelevant evidence was received, it is quite clear that its nature was not such as to prejudice defendant before the jury. The damages awarded are not so excessive as to warrant interference by this court.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appealed to the district court from an award of damages in condemnation proceedings, where he recovered a verdict of $200; and defendant appealed to this court from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

[284]*284A large number of errors are assigned, but a careful examination of them discloses no new or serious question of law or practice, and the case does not require an extended opinion. We have examined all the assignments, and discover no reversible error. Most of the errors assigned relate to the admission or exclusion of evidence, and, though perhaps some little incompetent or irrelevant evidence was received, it is quite clear that its nature was not such as to prejudice defendant before the jury. The damages awarded are not so excessive as to warrant interference by this court.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.W. 1134, 89 Minn. 283, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindahl-v-minnesota-north-wisconsin-railroad-minn-1903.