Lindahl v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lindahl v. City of New York

258 A.D. 1061, 17 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8892

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 1061 (Lindahl v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindahl v. City of New York, 258 A.D. 1061, 17 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits at the close of plaintiff’s case reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Plaintiff was unduly restricted and limited in presenting her proof. In the interest of substantial justice there should be a new trial. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits at the close of plaintiff’s case reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Plaintiff was unduly restricted and limited in presenting her proof. In the interest of substantial justice there should be a new trial. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 1061, 17 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindahl-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1940.