Linda S. Nowlin v. Lori Keaton

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 2, 2015·No. 03-14-00608-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-14-00608-CV 4339675 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/2/2015 4:41:03 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-14-00608-CV

IN THE FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE AUSTIN, TEXAS THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT 3/2/2015 4:41:03 PM AT AUSTIN, TEXAS JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk

LINDA NOWLIN, APPELLANT

V.

LORI KEATON, APPELLEE

APPEAL OF CAUSE C-1-CV-14-006938 FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW #1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF

DAVID NOWLIN ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

7301 RR 620 North, Ste. 155, 319 Austin, Texas 78726-4537 Telephone: (512) 468-4882 Email: DavidNowlin@me.com

NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL Appellant certifies that the following is a complete list of the parties, attor- neys, and all other interested persons regarding this matter:

1. The Appellant in this case is: Linda Nowlin Nowlin Properties 7301 RR 620 North, Ste. 155, 319 Austin, Texas 78726-4537

2. Appellant was represented David Nowlin at trial and on appeal by: Nowlin Properties 7301 RR 620 North, Ste. 155, 319 Austin, Texas 78726-4537

4. The Appellee in this case is: Lori Keaton The Giving Tree Learning Center 15102 Cavalier Canyon Drive Lakeway, Texas 78734

5. Appellee was represented Robby Abarca at trial and on appeal by: Attorney at Law P.O. Box 152547 Austin, Texas 78715

ii NOTATION AS TO THE FORM OF CITATION Citation in this brief will be as follows:

(a) Citation to the Reporter’s Record (R) will be to volume and page number, e.g., “2R12” refers to page 12 of the second volume of the Reporter’s Rec- ord and “SR12” refers to the same page of the supplemental volume. (b) Citation to the single-volume Clerk’s Record (CR) will be to page number only, e.g., “CR15” refers to page 15 of the Clerk’s Record. (c) Citation to the Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Exhibits (PX and DX respective- ly) will be to exhibit and page number, e.g., “2PX1” refers to page 1 of Plaintiff’s Exhibit #2. All exhibits in evidence are located, in the third vol- ume of the Reporter’s Record. (d) Citation to the Appellant’s and Appellee’s Briefs (PB and DB respectively) will be to page number only, e.g., “PB1” refers to page 1 of Appellant’s Brief and “DB1” refers to page 1 of Appellee’s Brief.

iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .i

Identification of the Parties and Counsel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ii

Notation as to the Form of Citation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iii

Table of Contents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iv

Index of Authorities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .v

Statement of the Case. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .vi

Points of Error. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .vii

Statement of Facts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1

Summary of Argument. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1

Argument. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4

I. Appellee Misrepresents the Record and the Holding in E.J. Rohrt When She States That a Landlord May Not Recover Future Rents When She, Rather Than a Tenant, Terminates a Lease. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4

II. Appellee Also Misrepresents Applicable Law When She Argues that Appellant Waived Her Right to Receive Delinquent Rent from Appellee for Time Spent in Possession of the Property. . . . . . . . . .8

Prayer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11

Certificate of Service. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12

Certificate of Compliance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12

Appendix. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13

iv INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

Texas Supreme Court

Dearborn Stove Co. v. Caples, 236 S.W.2d 486 (Tex. 1951) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6

E.J. Rohrt et al, v. Kelley Manufacturing Company, 349 S.W.2d 95 (Tex. 1961) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4, 5, 6

Sanderson v. Sanderson, 109 S.W.2d 744 (Tex. 1937) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8

Texas Courts of Appeals

Walling v. Christie Hobby, Inc., 54 S.W.2d 186 (Tex.Civ.App.—Galveston 1932, N.W.H.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4, 5, 6

Sargent v. Highlite Broadcasting Co., 466 S.W.2d 866 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1971, no writ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8, 9

Rules TEX.R.CIV.PROC. 740. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6

v STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant filed her suit for forcible detainer (herein referred to alternately as

“eviction”) in Travis County Justice Court #2 on June 6, 2014. 2R71, CR30. In

her petition, Appellant pled damages for “all rents … according to the lease dated

5/1/14”. CR30. Additionally, she indicated that attorney fees and court costs were

sought in unspecified amounts. Id. On July 2, 2014, judgment was rendered in fa-

vor of Appellee. CR11. On or about July 23, 2014, Appellant appealed from that

judgment to the Travis County Court at Law #1. CR5.

On August 25, 2014, this cause came to be heard in County Court at Law #1,

for trial by jury, which returned a verdict in Appellee’s favor. CR144-CR147. On

August 28, 2014, Appellant moved the County Court to render judgment notwith-

standing the jury’s verdict, to grant a new trial and to issue written rulings on her

proposed jury questions. CR153-CR175. On September 17, 2014, the court de-

nied all post-judgment motions and rendered judgment in favor of Appellee that

Appellant take nothing, noting specifically that Appellant was not entitled to col-

lect the rent in arrears for July and August of 2014. SR5, SR10-SR12, CR176.

Appellant filed her notice of appeal on September 22, 2014, and this appeal

ensued. CR177.

vi ISSUES PRESENTED I. Appellee Misrepresents the Record and the Holding in E.J. Rohrt When She States That a Landlord May Not Recover Future Rents When She, Rather Than a Tenant, Terminates a Lease.

II. Appellee Also Misrepresents Applicable Law When She Argues that Appellant Waived Her Right to Receive Delinquent Rent from Appellee for Time Spent in Possession of the Property.

vii STATEMENT OF FACTS

On April 12, 2014, Linda Nowlin (hereinafter named “Appellant”) and

Lori Keaton (hereinafter named “Appellee”) created a Residential Lease Con-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linda S. Nowlin v. Lori Keaton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Linda S. Nowlin v. Lori Keaton (Linda S. Nowlin v. Lori Keaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dearborn Stove Co. v. Caples
236 S.W.2d 486 (Texas Supreme Court, 1951)
Sargent v. Highlite Broadcasting Co.
466 S.W.2d 866 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Rohrt v. Kelley Manufacturing Company
349 S.W.2d 95 (Texas Supreme Court, 1961)
Walling v. Christie & Hobby, Inc.
54 S.W.2d 186 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Sanderson v. Sanderson
109 S.W.2d 744 (Texas Supreme Court, 1937)