Linda Pugh v. Dr. Jose A. Montes, Sr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 23, 2003
Docket01-02-00873-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Linda Pugh v. Dr. Jose A. Montes, Sr. (Linda Pugh v. Dr. Jose A. Montes, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linda Pugh v. Dr. Jose A. Montes, Sr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Opinion issued October 23, 2003




In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-02-00873-CV


LINDA PUGH, Appellant


V.


DR. JOSE A. MONTES, SR., INDIVIDUALLY, JOSE A. MONTES, SR., M.D., P.A., CARIETY MEDICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. AND YOUR MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., Appellees





On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2000-42683





MEMORANDUM OPINION

          This is an appeal from a no-evidence summary judgment signed on July 29, 2002. Notice of appeal was timely filed on August 13, 2002. The clerk’s record was filed on October 10, 2002.

          On September 13, 2002, a month after the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed an affidavit/declaration of indigence in the trial court. An affidavit of indigence must be filed with or before the notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(c)(1). The court of appeals may extend the time for filing an affidavit of indigence if within 15 days after the deadline for filing the affidavit of indigence, the appellant files an extension motion in the appellate court. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(c)(3). Appellant’s affidavit of indigence is ineffective to allow her to proceed without advance payment of costs because it was filed after the deadline of August 28, 2002, and after any extension allowed under Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(c)(3).

          Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee of $125 or the $10 filing fee for each of the three motions she has filed in this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 5; Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998).

          On May 8, 2003, we ordered that unless by June 9, 2003, appellant paid such filing fees to the Clerk of this Court, or requested the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a timely filed affidavit of indigence with the trial court in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 20.1, the appeal would be dismissed. See Finley v. J.C. Pace Ltd., 4 S.W. 3d 319, 321-22 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999) (order); Negrini v. Smith, Nelson & Clement P.C., 998 S.W. 2d 362, 363 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.).

          June 9, 2003 has passed and appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee or the filing fee for the motions she has filed.

          Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hedges, Nuchia, and Keyes.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DL NEGRINI v. Smith, Nelson & Clement PC
998 S.W.2d 362 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Finley v. J.C. Pace Ltd.
4 S.W.3d 319 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Linda Pugh v. Dr. Jose A. Montes, Sr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linda-pugh-v-dr-jose-a-montes-sr-texapp-2003.