Linda Ottinger v. Shelly Evans Ottinger - Concurring

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided July 21, 2004·No. E2003-02893-COA-R3-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 10, 2004 Session

LINDA OTTINGER, ET AL. v. SHELLY EVANS OTTINGER

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 01-D-1899 Jacqueline E. Schulten, Judge

No. E2003-02893-COA-R3-CV Filed July 21, 2004

CHARLES D. SUSANO , JR., J., concurring.

I concur completely in Judge Swiney’s opinion. I write separately to emphasize what the majority opinion expressly states, i.e., that the Defendant in the instant case did not challenge the constitutionality of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-306 (2001 & Supp. 2003). I continue to have some doubt that the deprivation of a relationship with grandparents can form the basis for the type of substantial harm contemplated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Hawk v. Hawk, 855 S.W.2d 573 (Tenn. 1993). See Dugan v. Myers, C/A No. E2001-00281-COA-R3-JV, 2001 WL 1117514, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. E.S., filed September 24, 2001), no perm. app. requested (Susano, J., concurring). However, since that issue is not before us in this case, we do not need to reach it.

_______________________________ CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linda Ottinger v. Shelly Evans Ottinger - Concurring, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

Linda Ottinger v. Shelly Evans Ottinger - Concurring (Linda Ottinger v. Shelly Evans Ottinger - Concurring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hawk v. Hawk
855 S.W.2d 573 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1993)