Linda Ottinger v. Shelly Evans Ottinger - Concurring
This text of Linda Ottinger v. Shelly Evans Ottinger - Concurring (Linda Ottinger v. Shelly Evans Ottinger - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 10, 2004 Session
LINDA OTTINGER, ET AL. v. SHELLY EVANS OTTINGER
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 01-D-1899 Jacqueline E. Schulten, Judge
No. E2003-02893-COA-R3-CV Filed July 21, 2004
CHARLES D. SUSANO , JR., J., concurring.
I concur completely in Judge Swiney’s opinion. I write separately to emphasize what the majority opinion expressly states, i.e., that the Defendant in the instant case did not challenge the constitutionality of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-306 (2001 & Supp. 2003). I continue to have some doubt that the deprivation of a relationship with grandparents can form the basis for the type of substantial harm contemplated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Hawk v. Hawk, 855 S.W.2d 573 (Tenn. 1993). See Dugan v. Myers, C/A No. E2001-00281-COA-R3-JV, 2001 WL 1117514, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. E.S., filed September 24, 2001), no perm. app. requested (Susano, J., concurring). However, since that issue is not before us in this case, we do not need to reach it.
_______________________________ CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Linda Ottinger v. Shelly Evans Ottinger - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linda-ottinger-v-shelly-evans-ottinger-concurring-tennctapp-2004.