Linda Lewis v. Select Medical Corporation
This text of Linda Lewis v. Select Medical Corporation (Linda Lewis v. Select Medical Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered July 11, 2018
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00005-CV
THE ESTATE HONORY LOUISE GREEN JR., CARE OF LINDA LEWIS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, ET AL, Appellants
V.
SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION, ET AL, Appellees
On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-10338
ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown
This appeal was filed by Linda Lewis, appearing pro se, in her capacity as personal
representative of her father’s estate as well as on behalf of her siblings, mother, and herself.
Because Lewis is not a licensed attorney, we questioned whether she could appear on behalf of
the estate and whether her notice of appeal filed on behalf of her family was effective. See
Paselk v. Rabun, 293 S.W.3d 600, 606 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009, pet. denied) (layperson
may not file notice of appeal on behalf of another person); Steele v. McDonald, 202 S.W.3d 926,
928 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, order) (per curiam) (pro se appellant may not prosecute appeal in
capacity as independent executor of estate).
At our request, Lewis filed a letter brief addressing our concerns, but the letter failed to
demonstrate she had authority to represent her family or proceed in her capacity as personal representative of the estate.1 We then gave each family member an opportunity to file an
amended notice of appeal signed by all who wished to pursue the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
9.1(b), 25.1(c),(e)-(g). We cautioned each that failure to comply by May 21, 2018 could result in
dismissal of his or her appeal.
Rather than an amended notice of appeal, a motion to recuse the Court was filed. The
motion was denied and, although more than a month has passed since the motion was denied, the
amended notice of appeal has still not been filed. Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal as to
Jeraline Green, Laura Roberts, Ruby Anthony, Kathy Rodeo, Raymond Green, and Johnnie
Green. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). We further DISMISS the appeal filed by Lewis in her
capacity as personal representative of her father’s estate. See id. The appeal shall proceed only
as to Lewis in her individual capacity.
As the clerk’s record has been filed and Lewis has informed the Court she no longer
wishes to have the reporter’s record filed, we ORDER Lewis to file her brief within thirty days
of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to change the style of the appeal to Linda Lewis v.
Select Medical Corporation, Select Medical Corporation CEO David Chernow, Executive
Chairman Robert Ortenzio, Vice Chairman Rocco A. Ortenzio, Select Specialty Hospital South
Dallas, Dr. Adolphus Gist, Associate Judge Sheryl Day McFarlin, and Senior Judge Michael J.
O’Neill.
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
1 Lewis attached to her letter brief a copy of a “power of attorney” reflecting she had power to act as executive administrator of the estate and for her mother and siblings. A power of attorney, however, authorizes an individual only to transact business for the principal; it does not authorize a person to act as a licensed attorney, representing individuals in proceedings in court. See Harkins v. Murphy & Bolanz, 112 S.W. 136, 138 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1908, writ dism’d); BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1013 (9th ed., 2010).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Linda Lewis v. Select Medical Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linda-lewis-v-select-medical-corporation-texapp-2018.