Linda Julia Miller v. Laubscher, etc.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia
• Decided: September 19, 1995
• Docket: 0855954
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis

LINDA JULIA MILLER

v. Record No. 0855-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM LAUBSCHER, PRESTA & LAUBSCHER SEPTEMBER 19, 1995 AND STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Robert B. Adams; Ashcraft & Gerel, on brief), for appellant.

(Ruth N. Carter; Midkiff & Hiner, on brief), for appellees.

Linda Julia Miller contends that the Workers' Compensation

Commission erred in suspending her compensation benefits. Upon

reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude

that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily

affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable

to the employer, the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg.

Corp. v. Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788

(1990). Factual findings made by the commission must be upheld

by this Court if supported by credible evidence. James v.

Capitol Steel Constr. Co., 8 Va. App. 512, 515, 382 S.E.2d 833,

835 (1989).

Miller argues that the record contains no credible evidence * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. that she failed to cooperate with employer's vocational

rehabilitation efforts. In granting employer's application

seeking to suspend Miller's compensation benefits, the commission

found as follows: We do not find that [Miller] cooperated with rehabilitation efforts. According to the treating physician, Dr. [Khosrow] Matini, [Miller] had the ability to perform sedentary work, including writing with a pencil, pushing buttons, and driving a standard shift automobile. Yet [Miller] has portrayed herself to potential employers as essentially unemployable, thus sabotaging efforts to find employment. It appears from the record that [Miller] was unwilling to attempt even a part-time job allowing her to work on the telephone at home scheduling truck pick-ups.

The commission's findings are supported by Dr. Matini's

medical reports and the testimony of the rehabilitation

consultant, Patricia Wendy Held. Therefore, those findings are

binding and conclusive upon us on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm

the commission's decision to suspend benefits until Miller

demonstrates a good faith effort to cooperate with rehabilitation

efforts.

Affirmed.