Linda Hernandez, Jose Hernandez, Javier Vasquez, Claudia Gil, Raul Vasquez and Virginia Vasquez v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols Sorrels & Friend, a Texas General Partnership, Randall Sorrels and Bernardino Agosto, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 25, 2013
Docket01-13-00179-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Linda Hernandez, Jose Hernandez, Javier Vasquez, Claudia Gil, Raul Vasquez and Virginia Vasquez v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols Sorrels & Friend, a Texas General Partnership, Randall Sorrels and Bernardino Agosto, Jr. (Linda Hernandez, Jose Hernandez, Javier Vasquez, Claudia Gil, Raul Vasquez and Virginia Vasquez v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols Sorrels & Friend, a Texas General Partnership, Randall Sorrels and Bernardino Agosto, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linda Hernandez, Jose Hernandez, Javier Vasquez, Claudia Gil, Raul Vasquez and Virginia Vasquez v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols Sorrels & Friend, a Texas General Partnership, Randall Sorrels and Bernardino Agosto, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00179-CV Linda Hernandez, Jose Hernandez, Javier Vasquez, Claudia Gil, Raul Vasquez and Style: Virginia Vasquez v Abraham, Watkins, Nichols Sorrels & Friend, A Texas General Partnership, Randall Sorrels and Bernardino Agosto, Jr. Date motion filed*: June 19, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to Exceed Word Limit in Appellants’ Brief Party filing motion: Appellants Document to be filed: Brief

If motion to extend time: Deadline to file document: July 1, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: Length of extension sought:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part If document is to be filed, document due:

 The Clerk is instructed to file the document as of the date of this order  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

Appellants’ brief may not exceed 17,500 words. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(B), (i)(4). The aggregate of all briefs filed by appellants must not exceed 27,000 words. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(B).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ______________________________.

Date: June 25, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Linda Hernandez, Jose Hernandez, Javier Vasquez, Claudia Gil, Raul Vasquez and Virginia Vasquez v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols Sorrels & Friend, a Texas General Partnership, Randall Sorrels and Bernardino Agosto, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linda-hernandez-jose-hernandez-javier-vasquez-claudia-gil-raul-vasquez-texapp-2013.