LINDA COCHRAN TECCHIO vs STATE OF FLORIDA

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: March 31, 2023
• Docket: 22-1823
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

LINDA COCHRAN TECCHIO,

Appellant,

v. Case Nos. 5D22-1820 5D22-1823 LT Case Nos. 2020-CF-004001-A 2020-CF-004002-A

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed March 31, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Robert J. Pearce, III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences

imposed by the trial court following revocation of Appellant’s probation.

However, we remand for correction of two scrivener’s errors in the orders

revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found to have violated

condition 5 in 2020-CF-4001 and condition 5 and special condition 2 in 2020-

CF-4002. See Polite v. State, 339 So. 3d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Harrison

v. State, 313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). Neither order should reflect a

violation of standard condition 2.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S

ERROR.

WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS JJ., concur.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).