Lind v. Miller
This text of 145 Misc. 477 (Lind v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An allowance made to an incompetent World War veteran is exempt from levy and sale by virtue of an execution, and from seizure in any legal proceeding. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 667.) Obviously, this would be so if the pension has been received by the veteran, his committee or guardian; otherwise such an exemption can produce no beneficial effect. (Benedict v. Higgins, 165 App. Div. 611; Surace v. Danna, 248 N. Y. 18.)
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
145 Misc. 477, 260 N.Y.S. 343, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lind-v-miller-nyappterm-1932.