Lincoln v. Bailey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6602

RICHARD POWERS LINCOLN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANIEL E. BAILEY, Sheriff; ARAMARK CORPORATION; B. SMITH SCOTT; L. PAGEN, Major; M. SMITH, Captain; J. PLOGER, Captain; J. MANESS, Sergeant; D. TRUESDALE, Sergeant; G. ROGERS, Sergeant; P. IGWESI, Detention Officer; J. SAGE, Detention Officer; K. JOHNSON, Detention Officer; C. SMITH, Detention Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00058-GCM)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Powers Lincoln, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Powers Lincoln appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Lincoln v. Bailey, No. 3:09-cv-00058-GCM (W.D.N.C. Mar.

3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED