Lincoln Sterling Corp. v. State Theatre Dunkirk, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lincoln Sterling Corp. v. State Theatre Dunkirk, Inc.

256 A.D. 1035

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 1035 (Lincoln Sterling Corp. v. State Theatre Dunkirk, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lincoln Sterling Corp. v. State Theatre Dunkirk, Inc., 256 A.D. 1035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The finding of the trial justice that the president of the plaintiff corporation made the statement upon which the estoppel is based was not, in view of all the circumstances, including the stock ownership of the plaintiff corporation, against the weight of the evidence. The authorization to the president to carry out the sale contained in the resolution of the corporation’s stockholders with its lack of hmitation, was sufficient to justify his binding the corporation by a statement substantially to the effect that the mortgage of the plaintiff corporation would be subordinated to the respondent’s lease. All concur. (The portion of the judgment appealed from adjudges plaintiff’s mortgage subordinate to the lease of the State Theatre Dunkirk, Inc., and denies foreclosure as against said lease.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The finding of the trial justice that the president of the plaintiff corporation made the statement upon which the estoppel is based was not, in view of all the circumstances, including the stock ownership of the plaintiff corporation, against the weight of the evidence. The authorization to the president to carry out the sale contained in the resolution of the corporation’s stockholders with its lack of hmitation, was sufficient to justify his binding the corporation by a statement substantially to the effect that the mortgage of the plaintiff corporation would be subordinated to the respondent’s lease. All concur. (The portion of the judgment appealed from adjudges plaintiff’s mortgage subordinate to the lease of the State Theatre Dunkirk, Inc., and denies foreclosure as against said lease.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 1035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lincoln-sterling-corp-v-state-theatre-dunkirk-inc-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack