Lincoln National Bank v. Miller
100 A. 269, 255 Pa. 467, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 476
Opinion
This case is clearly distinguishable from First National Bank v. Gerli, 232 Pa. 465, relied upon by counsel for appellant. The distinction is sufficiently pointed out in the opinion of the learned court below making absolute the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, and, on that opinion, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lincoln National Bank v. Miller, 100 A. 269, 255 Pa. 467, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 476 (Pa. 1917).
100 A. 269 (Lincoln National Bank v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bosworth v. Greiling
250 N.W. 856 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1934)
American Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 476 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)