Lincoln Mfg. Co. v. New Haven Clock Co.

135 F. 1023, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 5210

This text of 135 F. 1023 (Lincoln Mfg. Co. v. New Haven Clock Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lincoln Mfg. Co. v. New Haven Clock Co., 135 F. 1023, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 5210 (circtsdny 1904).

Opinion

LACOMBE,

Circuit Judge. In view of the phraseology of the contract sued upon, the complaint is not entirely clear, and the motion is granted, so far as the first two propositions in the moving papers are concerned. When that is done, there need be no difficulty about answering the complaint, and whether or not a bill of particulars should be required can then be determined. There will have to be a substitution of attorney for the plaintiff. George Alfred Lamb, whose name appears on the papers, is a member of the state bar, and therefore properly began the cause in the state court; but he has never been admitted to practice at the bar of the United States Circuit Court in this District

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 F. 1023, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 5210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lincoln-mfg-co-v-new-haven-clock-co-circtsdny-1904.