Lincoln Lynch, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Raymark Industries, Inc., Defendants-Petitioners

701 F.2d 42, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30295
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 1983
Docket82-8413, 82-8418, 82-8426 to 82-8432 and 82-8435
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 701 F.2d 42 (Lincoln Lynch, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Raymark Industries, Inc., Defendants-Petitioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lincoln Lynch, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Raymark Industries, Inc., Defendants-Petitioners, 701 F.2d 42, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30295 (6th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These matters are before the court upon consideration of petitions for permission to appeal and briefs in opposition thereto.

The petitioners are defendants in product liabilities cases where damages are sought against various manufacturers, processors and users of asbestos materials. Two of the defendants in these actions, Johns-Manville Sales Corp. and Unarco Industries, Inc., filed Chapter 11 proceedings in bankruptcy courts. Pursuant to § 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code all proceedings against the two filing defendants were automatically stayed. The petitioners, as co-defendants of Johns-Manville and Unarco, then filed motions in the district court to stay the pending actions until the Chapter 11 proceedings of Johns-Manville and Unarco are complete.

The district court filed an opinion and order denying the motion for a stay and certifying its order for immediate appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The petitioners filed applications for permission to appeal to this court as required by § 1292(b), and the matter has been assigned to a panel of the court. Upon consideration we conclude that the purposes of § 1292(b) will be served by granting an immediate appeal.

Accordingly, the application for permission to appeal is granted, and the appeal is expedited. The clerk of the court will establish a briefing schedule and set these appeals for oral argument in due course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 F.2d 42, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lincoln-lynch-plaintiffs-respondents-v-johns-manville-sales-corp-ca6-1983.