Lincks v. Erie Railroad
116 A. 493, 97 N.J.L. 343, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 207
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trbxchakd, Bergen, Kalisch, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackbrson, Van Busk irk, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lincks v. Erie Railroad, 116 A. 493, 97 N.J.L. 343, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 207 (N.J. 1922).
116 A. 493 (Lincks v. Erie Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Hudson United Bank
493 F. Supp. 434 (D. New Jersey, 1980)
New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Popovich
107 A.2d 345 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)