Lincer v. Canaday Cooler Co.

246 A.D. 805

This text of 246 A.D. 805 (Lincer v. Canaday Cooler Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lincer v. Canaday Cooler Co., 246 A.D. 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Consolidated actions to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while a passenger in an automobile of defendant Canaday Cooler Co., Inc., driven by defendant Jack Rubin. The complaint alleges that defendant Rubin so negligently operated the car as to cause it to drive off the road and overturn. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Dore, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the following [806]*806grounds: There was a failure of proof; the verdict is contrary to the overwhelming evidence and the charge failed to properly place the issues of fact before the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lincer-v-canaday-cooler-co-nyappdiv-1935.