Linares v. Bratton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Linares v. Bratton

227 A.D.2d 169, 642 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4812

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 227 A.D.2d 169 (Linares v. Bratton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linares v. Bratton, 227 A.D.2d 169, 642 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated March 1, 1994, which revoked petitioner’s pistol licenses, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by an order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Beverly Cohen, J.], entered March 13, 1995) dismissed, without costs.

[170]*170Respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence that petitioner displayed one of his guns to an individual in a threatening manner, carried a gun to work, and failed to secure his guns when at home. No basis exists to disturb the Hearing Officer’s findings of credibility. License revocation is an appropriate punishment (see, Matter of Lipton v Ward, 116 AD2d 474, 476). Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated March 1, 1994, which revoked petitioner’s pistol licenses, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by an order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Beverly Cohen, J.], entered March 13, 1995) dismissed, without costs.

[170]*170Respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence that petitioner displayed one of his guns to an individual in a threatening manner, carried a gun to work, and failed to secure his guns when at home. No basis exists to disturb the Hearing Officer’s findings of credibility. License revocation is an appropriate punishment (see, Matter of Lipton v Ward, 116 AD2d 474, 476). Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D.2d 169, 642 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linares-v-bratton-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack