Linacre v. Lush

New York Supreme Court

Linacre v. Lush

3 Wend. 305

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1829

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Wend. 305 (Linacre v. Lush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linacre v. Lush, 3 Wend. 305 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

Taxation of costs. The plaintiff having paid costs to the defendant for not proceeding to trial pursuant to notice at a circuit, antecedent to that at which the cause was treid and a verdict found for the plaintiff; in making up his bill of costs charged the defendant with the plaintiff’s costs of the first circuit. This was objected to by the defendant, and the question submitted to the court, who said that the plaintiff was not entitled to such costs.

J. McKown, for plaintiff.

S. S. Lush, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taxation of costs. The plaintiff having paid costs to the defendant for not proceeding to trial pursuant to notice at a circuit, antecedent to that at which the cause was treid and a verdict found for the plaintiff; in making up his bill of costs charged the defendant with the plaintiff’s costs of the first circuit. This was objected to by the defendant, and the question submitted to the court, who said that the plaintiff was not entitled to such costs.

J. McKown, for plaintiff.

S. S. Lush, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Wend. 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linacre-v-lush-nysupct-1829.

Opinion

J. McKown, for plaintiff.

S. S. Lush, for defendant.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack