Lin v. Rohm & Haas Co.

138 S. Ct. 985, 200 L. Ed. 2d 300
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 20, 2018·No. No. 17–784.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lin v. Rohm & Haas Co., 138 S. Ct. 985, 200 L. Ed. 2d 300 (U.S. 2018).

138 S. Ct. 985 (Lin v. Rohm & Haas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gorss Motels, Inc. v. Safemark Systems, LP
931 F.3d 1094 (Eleventh Circuit, 2019)
Cunningham v. Wawa, Inc.
387 F. Supp. 3d 529 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2019)
Physicians Healthsource, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.
340 F. Supp. 3d 445 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2018)
In re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig.
331 F. Supp. 3d 152 (S.D. Illinois, 2018)
Raitport v. Harbour Capital Corp.
312 F. Supp. 3d 225 (D. New Hampshire, 2018)
Campbell v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.
311 F. Supp. 3d 281 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Practice Mgmt. Support Servs., Inc. v. Cirque Du Soleil, Inc.
301 F. Supp. 3d 840 (E.D. Illinois, 2018)