Lin v. Joe Japanese Buffet Restaurant Inc.

E.D. New York

Lin v. Joe Japanese Buffet Restaurant Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York·Decided July 13, 2022·No. 1:17-cv-03435·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK penne ee eee ene nenenenenenene JIAN HUI LIN a/k/a Danny Lin, on behalf of : himself and others similarly situated, : Plaintiff, □ : ORDER v. . Gy 17-CV-3435 (WFK) (CLP) JOE JAPANESE BUFFET RESTAURANT INC, d/b/a Fuji Japanese Cuisine, et al.,

Defendants. : ramen nana nnmnnm nna nmmnn enna nema SR WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, HL, United States District Judge: On June 7, 2022, Chief Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in the above-captioned action, recommending Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees be granted and Plaintiffs be awarded $67,665.55, consisting of $67,265.55 in fees and $400.00 in costs. See ECF No. 100. Chief Magistrate Judge Pollak also recommended the remainder of plaintiffs’ requested costs be denied without prejudice to renew if supported by the appropriate documentation. —

The parties did not file any objections to the R&R, which were due by Tuesday, June 21, 2022. See 28 U.S.C, § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court reviews an R&R for clear error when no objections have been filed. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224,226 (E.D.N,Y. 2007) (Garaufis, J.). The Court finds no such error here. The Court therefore adopts the R&R in its entirety. □

SO ORDERED. me a ZS s/ WFK □ Z7 HON. WILIGAMY. KUNTZ, 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 13, 2022 Brooklyn, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK penne ee eee ene nenenenenenene JIAN HUI LIN a/k/a Danny Lin, on behalf of : himself and others similarly situated, : Plaintiff, □ : ORDER v. . Gy 17-CV-3435 (WFK) (CLP) JOE JAPANESE BUFFET RESTAURANT INC, d/b/a Fuji Japanese Cuisine, et al.,

Defendants. : ramen nana nnmnnm nna nmmnn enna nema SR WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, HL, United States District Judge: On June 7, 2022, Chief Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in the above-captioned action, recommending Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees be granted and Plaintiffs be awarded $67,665.55, consisting of $67,265.55 in fees and $400.00 in costs. See ECF No. 100. Chief Magistrate Judge Pollak also recommended the remainder of plaintiffs’ requested costs be denied without prejudice to renew if supported by the appropriate documentation. —

The parties did not file any objections to the R&R, which were due by Tuesday, June 21, 2022. See 28 U.S.C, § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court reviews an R&R for clear error when no objections have been filed. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224,226 (E.D.N,Y. 2007) (Garaufis, J.). The Court finds no such error here. The Court therefore adopts the R&R in its entirety. □

SO ORDERED. me a ZS s/ WFK □ Z7 HON. WILIGAMY. KUNTZ, 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 13, 2022 Brooklyn, New York

Lin v. Joe Japanese Buffet Restaurant Inc., (E.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Lin v. Joe Japanese Buffet Restaurant Inc. (Lin v. Joe Japanese Buffet Restaurant Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related