Limones v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Limones v. City of New York

256 A.D.2d 54, 680 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13046

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 A.D.2d 54 (Limones v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Limones v. City of New York, 256 A.D.2d 54, 680 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered on or about November 25, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendant’s answer for failure to comply with plaintiffs’ notice of discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given defendant’s compliance, albeit belated, with the preliminary conference order, which largely incorporated plaintiffs’ notice of discovery, it cannot be said that defendant’s failure to comply with plaintiffs’ discovery demands was willful and contumacious so as to warrant the drastic relief sought by plaintiffs on the motion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered on or about November 25, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendant’s answer for failure to comply with plaintiffs’ notice of discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given defendant’s compliance, albeit belated, with the preliminary conference order, which largely incorporated plaintiffs’ notice of discovery, it cannot be said that defendant’s failure to comply with plaintiffs’ discovery demands was willful and contumacious so as to warrant the drastic relief sought by plaintiffs on the motion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 54, 680 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/limones-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack