Limon-Perez v. Holder
This text of 373 F. App'x 818 (Limon-Perez v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Nazario Limon-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order vacating an immigration judge’s decision granting his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s continuous physical presence determination. Landin-Zavala v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 1150, 1151 (9th Cir.2007). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Limon-Perez did not meet the continuous physical presence requirement because the record shows he was placed in exclusion proceedings in 1996 and ordered excluded. See Landin-Zavala, 488 F.3d at 1153 (deportation under a formal exclusion order breaks an applicant’s continuous physical presence).
Because Limon-Perez failed to demonstrate a gross miscarriage of justice, he may not, at this point, collaterally attack his June 13, 1996, exclusion order. See Ramirez-Juarez v. INS, 633 F.2d 174, 175-76 (9th Cir.1980) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
373 F. App'x 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/limon-perez-v-holder-ca9-2010.