Limon-Fitch v. Holder
This text of 323 F. App'x 607 (Limon-Fitch v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[608]*608MEMORANDUM
Oscar Limon-Fitch, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Hughes v. Ashcroft, 255 F.3d 752, 755 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition for review.
The IJ did not err in concluding that Limon-Fitch did not acquire United States citizenship at birth from his mother. See 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a)(7)(1954); Runnett v. Shultz, 901 F.2d 782, 783 (9th Cir.1990) (theory of constructive residence does not apply in citizenship transmission case).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
323 F. App'x 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/limon-fitch-v-holder-ca9-2009.