LIMOINE ESTIME v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and CARLA BEATRIZ GUZMAN MALDONADO

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

LIMOINE J. ESTIME, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and CARLA BEATRIZ GUZMAN MALDONADO, Appellees.

No. 4D21-2508

[April 27, 2022]

Administrative appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program; L.T. Case Nos. 50210700358CA, 2021AS700358, 201610598.

Limoine J. Estime, Jr., West Palm Beach, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Limoine Estime, Jr. appeals the Department of Revenue’s final administrative paternity and support order. As his arguments on appeal were not preserved below, we affirm.

As in Lozano v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement, 311 So. 3d 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021), our affirmance is “without prejudice for the appellant to seek a modification of the final administrative support order as set forth in section 409.2563(12), Florida Statutes (2020), or a superseding order in the circuit court pursuant to section 409.2563(10)(c), Florida Statutes (2020).” Id.

Affirmed without prejudice.

CONNER, C.J., FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.