Lime Rock Bank v. Macomber
29 Me. 564
Opinion
The ComtT, by
orally.
Formerly the assent of the bank, in such a case, was required to be proved by record. More recently the consent of its officers has been held sufficient. The jury were justified in finding such consent. A suit in the name of the United States was recently maintained by direction of the Postmaster General, for the benefit of an individual. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lime Rock Bank v. Macomber, 29 Me. 564 (Me. 1849).
29 Me. 564 (Lime Rock Bank v. Macomber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.