Lime Cola Bottling Co. v. Harris Tire Co.
99 S.E. 540, 23 Ga. App. 802, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 363
Opinion
There was no error in overruling the demurrer, or in the admission of testimony. The evidence in this ease, which was tried according to law, supported, if it did not demand, the verdict returned for the plaintiff. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lime Cola Bottling Co. v. Harris Tire Co., 99 S.E. 540, 23 Ga. App. 802, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 363 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
99 S.E. 540 (Lime Cola Bottling Co. v. Harris Tire Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Devine v. Geiger
110 S.E.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)