Lime Cola Bottling Co. v. Harris Tire Co.
99 S.E. 540, 23 Ga. App. 802, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 363
This text of 99 S.E. 540 (Lime Cola Bottling Co. v. Harris Tire Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lime Cola Bottling Co. v. Harris Tire Co., 99 S.E. 540, 23 Ga. App. 802, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 363 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
There was no error in overruling the demurrer, or in the admission of testimony. The evidence in this ease, which was tried according to law, supported, if it did not demand, the verdict returned for the plaintiff. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Devine v. Geiger
110 S.E.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 540, 23 Ga. App. 802, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lime-cola-bottling-co-v-harris-tire-co-gactapp-1919.