Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Limat v. State

Limat v. State

557 So. 2d 242, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1310, 1990 WL 20550
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 7, 1990
DocketNo. 89-0593
StatusPublished

This text of 557 So. 2d 242 (Limat v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Limat v. State, 557 So. 2d 242, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1310, 1990 WL 20550 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

PER CURIAM.

We grant the public defender’s Anders motion to withdraw. We agree that the designated judicial acts are wholly frivolous and without merit. The public defender has complied with the requirements set forth in Anders and recently addressed by the supreme court in Forrester. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Order of the First District Court of Appeal Regarding Brief Filed in Forrester v. State, 556 So.2d 1114 (Fla.1990). We affirm the conviction and sentence and grant the public defender’s motion to withdraw.

DOWNEY, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In RE ORDER OF FIRST DIST. CT. OF APPEAL REGARDING BRIEF FILED IN FORRESTER v. State
556 So. 2d 1114 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
557 So. 2d 242, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1310, 1990 WL 20550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/limat-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.