Lima v. State
458 So. 2d 422, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2353, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15774
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 9, 1984·No. No. 84-296·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress cocaine found on the person of defendant after a search incident to his arrest. We disagree with defendant’s argument that the police lacked probable cause to arrest defendant who was present in a house where and when a drug transaction took place and who, after being detained, was identified by an accomplice as the drug supplier.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lima v. State, 458 So. 2d 422, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2353, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15774 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
458 So. 2d 422 (Lima v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rock v. State
912 So. 2d 690 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Sampson
616 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Russell v. State
458 So. 2d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)