Lima v. Lima

68 A.D.3d 935, 891 N.Y.2d 699

This text of 68 A.D.3d 935 (Lima v. Lima) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lima v. Lima, 68 A.D.3d 935, 891 N.Y.2d 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

An award of counsel fees is entrusted to the sound discretion of the court (see DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879 [1987]). In awarding counsel fees “a court should review the financial circumstances of both parties together with all the other circumstances of the case, which may include the relative, merit of the parties’ positions” (id. at 881). Here, in denying the plaintiff’s motion for an award of an attorney’s fee, the court considered the parties’ financial positions as well as the fact that the plaintiff commenced an action for divorce upon grounds that she knew were without merit. Under these circumstances, the order of the Supreme Court should not be disturbed on appeal. Covello, J.P., Santucci, Chambers and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete
518 N.E.2d 1168 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 935, 891 N.Y.2d 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lima-v-lima-nyappdiv-2009.