Lim v. Motor Supply, Ltd.
364 P.2d 38, 45 Haw. 198, 91 A.L.R. 2d 1067, 1961 Haw. LEXIS 69
Opinion
The petition for rehearing presents no ground for further consideration of the case. It is merely a reargument of matters considered and disposed of by our opinion.
Petition denied, all members of the court concurring except Cassidy, J., who dissented from the original opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lim v. Motor Supply, Ltd., 364 P.2d 38, 45 Haw. 198, 91 A.L.R. 2d 1067, 1961 Haw. LEXIS 69 (haw 1961).
364 P.2d 38 (Lim v. Motor Supply, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Casumpang v. ILWU LOCAL 142
121 P.3d 391 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2005)
Thompson v. Cheyenne Mountain School District No. 12
844 P.2d 1235 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1993)
Waymack v. KCLA, Inc.
664 S.W.2d 509 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1984)