Lily v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lily v. Mahoney

59 A.D.2d 823, 399 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 A.D.2d 823 (Lily v. Mahoney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lily v. Mahoney, 59 A.D.2d 823, 399 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition granted. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from the dismissal of his CPLR article 78 proceeding brought to annul a decision of the respondents which invalidated 702 signatures on his independent nominating petition with the result that petitioner was disqualified as an independent candidate for the office of Mayor in the City of Buffalo. The respondents’ basis for invalidating the signatures was that the signators, who concededly were duly qualified under section 138 of the Election Law, when they signed the petition prior to its filing on August 25, 1977, became retroactively disqualified by virtue of subdivision 10 of, section 138 of the Election Law by voting in the subsequent primary election which was held on September 8, 1977. Subdivision 10 of section 138 of the Election Law provides that the signature of a person may not be counted on an independent nominating petition "if such person voted at a primary election where a candidate was nominated for an office for which such petition purports to nominate a candidate”. No objection was made to the petition by the board of elections pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 330 of the Election Law or by anyone else until September 27, 1977 when the petition was rejected by respondents. We do not accept respondents’ interpretation of section 138 of the Election Law. The criteria provided by this section for persons who are qualified to sign independent nominating petitions are those that must exist on the date the petition is signed. It is not disputed that the petition was valid when filed on August 25, 1977. The signatures were not invalidated by the subsequent actions of the signators. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court—Election Law.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Dillon, Hancock, Goldman and Witmer, JJ. (Decided Oct. 7,1977.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition granted. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from the dismissal of his CPLR article 78 proceeding brought to annul a decision of the respondents which invalidated 702 signatures on his independent nominating petition with the result that petitioner was disqualified as an independent candidate for the office of Mayor in the City of Buffalo. The respondents’ basis for invalidating the signatures was that the signators, who concededly were duly qualified under section 138 of the Election Law, when they signed the petition prior to its filing on August 25, 1977, became retroactively disqualified by virtue of subdivision 10 of, section 138 of the Election Law by voting in the subsequent primary election which was held on September 8, 1977. Subdivision 10 of section 138 of the Election Law provides that the signature of a person may not be counted on an independent nominating petition "if such person voted at a primary election where a candidate was nominated for an office for which such petition purports to nominate a candidate”. No objection was made to the petition by the board of elections pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 330 of the Election Law or by anyone else until September 27, 1977 when the petition was rejected by respondents. We do not accept respondents’ interpretation of section 138 of the Election Law. The criteria provided by this section for persons who are qualified to sign independent nominating petitions are those that must exist on the date the petition is signed. It is not disputed that the petition was valid when filed on August 25, 1977. The signatures were not invalidated by the subsequent actions of the signators. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court—Election Law.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Dillon, Hancock, Goldman and Witmer, JJ. (Decided Oct. 7,1977.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 823, 399 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lily-v-mahoney-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack